Nonadditive causal input from distinct neighboring patterns¶
The composition theorem admits endogenous form and phase inputs between the three acquired C9 patterns. It does not assert that the mediator's response to two neighbors is the sum of its separate single-neighbor responses. This owner proves a finite failure of that additive description, with all four histories starting from the same complete acquired state.
The construction uses the existing law, support and structural clock. It evaluates static graph matrices and rational inequalities, not a selected trajectory or finite-time coefficient. Unlike a comparison with a linearized single-input law, the additive benchmark below retains each neighbor's complete nonlinear single-input response.
Complete histories and the matched additive benchmark¶
Keep the 27 nodes, 29 edges, unit capacities, bridges \((4,13),(13,22)\), and classes \((1,k,1)\), \(k=1,2\). The complete state consists of 27 forms followed by 27 continuous phase lifts. Let \(D\) be the actual degree matrix, with central degrees \((3,4,3)\), and \(A=D^{-1}L\). Use exactly
The target \(\Theta_k\) has aligned central origins and the stated ring windings. The original acquired-family association supplies the initial state: each component's form and phase errors have Euclidean norm at most \(\epsilon=10^{-32}\), with its original zero-sum and preparation constraints. The resulting maximum-coordinate cover is sufficient for the bounds below; independent preparation of its Cartesian corners is not assumed.
Choose one such complete state, including all hidden coordinates, and represent it before the input by \(z_{\mathrm{res},0}=(x_0,\theta_0-\Theta_k)\) about the original declared common origins. Below \(z_0\) denotes this complete residual vector; \(z_0=0\) means the nominal wound target, not zero absolute phases. Use the same source in four counterfactual histories. At time zero, apply the form jumps
Phases do not jump. All histories then evolve under (1), without resets. Let \(Y_{ij}=x_{13}^{ij}(T)\). The mixed response is
The matched additive port functional predicts
Thus \(M_k=Y_{11}-Y_{\rm add}\). Both single-neighbor functionals in (4) use the same complete source and the same full nonlinear law. This is a benchmark of additive causal input, not a newly supplied autonomous 54-coordinate comparator or a new energy law.
The general analytic hierarchy allows signed \(a,b\) with \(|a|+|b|\le7/5000\) and \(T\le2\). The finite discriminating certificate below selects, before any response or time-coefficient evaluation,
The theorem applies to each class separately. No cross-class subtraction is part of this observer.
The allowance \(\delta=10^{-30}\) is inherited from the earlier nonlinear-response observation contract. It differs from the \(10^{-8}\) allowance of the intervening changed-input memory comparison. Here it is a supplied mathematical observation allowance, not an established laboratory precision. The distinct-neighbor intervention and its mixed observable are new; this is not a finer-precision repetition of the memory comparison.
The mixed causal hierarchy and its symmetries¶
Let \(J_k\) denote the full tangent generator and \(Q_k,T_k\) the normalized phase maps of the complete amplitude hierarchy. Define their full-state lifts by
The phase maps include their quadratic and cubic factorials; the displayed lift includes the separate \(\gamma\). Let \(\mathcal V f(t)=\int_0^t e^{J_k(t-s)}f(s)\,ds\). Write \(u,v\) for the donor and receiver first-level histories, including their amplitudes. Define
The complete mixed cubic history is \(\mathcal V F_{\rm mix}\), where
This is an operator on two distinct causal input histories. It includes quadratic internal excitation followed by quadratic recoupling; retaining only the direct cubic term would change it.
Simultaneous reflection of the local ring indices fixes all three central ports. For the zero-residual nominal source, the central output is odd under \((a,b)\mapsto(-a,-b)\); even total amplitude degrees vanish. The quadratic history is generally nonzero in the hidden odd sector. It cannot be deleted from (6)-(7).
There are exact null controls. A zero amplitude makes (3) zero for every actual source by cancellation of identical histories. At the nominal source, \(a=-b\) also gives zero for all times: exchanging the identical outer rings changes the input to its negative while leaving the mediator observation fixed, and the reflection/sign symmetry changes that observation's sign. Arbitrary acquired residuals need not have either symmetry. The nominal opposite-input null is not asserted for every actual source.
A nonzero local interaction operator¶
Set \(\alpha=2\pi/9\), \(c_k=\cos(k\alpha)\). At the ideal postjump state, the phase slopes are
The four initial phase-gap slopes into the mediator are therefore
The last two are internal mediator edges and carry cosine \(c_k\). Omitting them loses organization dependence at the first mixed order.
The cubic part of the fourth time derivative comes entirely from the third derivative of the sine applied to the three phase slopes. The remaining differentiated terms have amplitude degree at most two at time zero. Their central mixed quadratic part vanishes by reflection. Equivalently, the quadratic phase history starts at time order four, so its recoupling cannot contribute to the order-four form term. Subtracting the two singles in the four incident cubes gives \(6(15+c_k)ab(a+b)\), with the common denominator \(4^3\). Including the degree-four normalization, sine factorial and time integration yields the full nonlinear onset
The amplitudes are held fixed in this statement. Equation (10) is not a finite-window certificate by itself. It already shows that distinct-neighbor additivity is not an exact identity and that this local interaction coefficient depends on the mediator organization. It does not establish a resolved finite cross-class contrast.
Static edge cones for the complete linear phase history¶
The following finite estimate avoids evaluating a time series at \(T\). Put \(P(t)=e^{-At}\), \(\eta=\gamma^2\), \(g=1/3000\), and \(D_T=1-2g^2T^2\). For one unit donor or receiver form impulse, write the complete tangent phase as \(\gamma w_p(t)\), \(p=4,22\). The corresponding heat phase is \(w_{h,p}=(I-P(t))e_p\).
For this graph \(\|Ae_p\|_\infty=1\). Markov contraction gives \(\|w_{h,p}(t)\|_\infty\le t\), and the full tangent feedback gives
This includes the phase Hessian on every internal and bridge edge; the phase is not replaced by its heat approximation.
Since \(\|A\|_\infty\le2\), commutation and contraction imply \(\|A^3P(s)e_p\|_\infty\le4\). Taylor's integral remainder gives
For an oriented edge \(i\to j\), set
Equations (11)-(12) enclose the entire edge history, for \(0<t\le T\), by the static interval
Every matrix in (13)-(14) is the exact rational normalized graph matrix. These are derivative/contraction bounds over a window, not evaluated phase responses.
The internal target cosines lie in \([1/6,1]\), while bridge cosines equal one. For example \(\cos(4\pi/9)=\sin(\pi/18)>1/6\) follows from \(25/8<\pi<22/7\) and \(\sin x\ge x-x^3/6\) on the relevant positive interval; \(\cos(2\pi/9)\) is larger. The same elementary bounds give \(1/3300<\gamma<g\).
Build 27 interval force rows, initially zero. For each of the 29 oriented edges put \(U=I_{4,ij}\), \(V=I_{22,ij}\), and let \(C_{ij}\) be its cosine interval. Add
Interval products retain all endpoint choices; shared cosine or phase dependencies are relaxed outward. If \(F_i(t)\) is the actual direct mixed cubic form force divided by \(\gamma^4m^3t^3\), (15) encloses it.
At \(T=1/8\), exact rational evaluation of (13)-(15) gives the following deliberately coarse static certificate:
| Force rows | Enclosure |
|---|---|
| Mediator center 13 | \(-3/20<F_{13}<-1/15\) |
| Every other node | \(-3/20<F_i<1/9\) |
For orientation, the outward force calculation gives \(-\sup F_{13}>0.0701642\), \(\max(0,\max_{i\ne13}\sup F_i)<0.104719\), and \(\max_i\sup|F_i|<0.142588\). Only the rational bounds in the table are needed below. All 29 edges are included; no favorable subset is selected. The cones shrink when \(T\) decreases, so the same coarse certificate holds for \(0<T\le1/8\). This finite static calculation generates no trajectory or selected finite-time coefficient.
Heat transport, hidden recoupling and complete cubic error¶
Let \(Z_M(T)\) be the mediator output obtained by heat-propagating only the direct cubic force of the complete first-level phase. For \(s\ge0\), \(P(s)\) is nonnegative with row sum one and
The last bound follows also from uniformization \(A=I-\mathsf P\) with nonnegative stochastic \(\mathsf P\). Set \(l=1/15\), \(B=1/9\). At an integration time \(t\), the force table implies
Integrating \(t^3\) and using \(\gamma>1/3300\) gives, at (5),
Also \(|Z_M(T)|\le(3/80)g^4m^3T^4\). Heat spreading is included in (17); the sign of the local forcing alone would not justify an endpoint sign.
There remain the quadratic recoupling and the phase feedback in the third-level propagator. They are not discarded. For each of the three nonzero nominal histories in (2), its initial form \(f\) satisfies
In particular the simultaneous history has maximum form \(m\), not \(2m\). Its total input variation is nevertheless \(2m\), as used later for amplitude and source remainders.
Use the exact scaled levels
Their linear blocks retain \(\eta=\gamma^2\). The scaled third form forcing is \(T(w_1,w_1,w_1)+2\eta Q(w_1,w_2)\), with \(\|Q(v,w)\|_\infty\le2\|v\|_\infty\|w\|_\infty\) and \(\|T(u,v,w)\|_\infty\le(4/3)\|u\|_\infty\|v\|_\infty\|w\|_\infty\). Time integration and heat contraction give
The denominator follows from the same two-row phase-feedback estimate as (11). The direct quadratic recoupling integral costs at most \(2g^6m^3T^6/(9D_T^4)\) in the original form. Integrating the third-level phase feedback costs at most \(2g^6m^3T^6/(45D_T^4)+g^8m^3T^8/(63D_T^5)\). Thus complete cubic mixed response differs from \(Z_M\) by at most
The factor three counts the three nonzero histories, each satisfying (19); it is not a cancellation of ten total-variation cubes. This estimate includes every internal quadratic mode and both phase rows.
Common-source cancellation and the finite sign¶
For the nominal central output, use the existing reflection remainder
For arbitrary actual residuals, retain the full common linear source \(\exp(J_kT)z_{\mathrm{res},0}\) and the separately bounded nonlinear initialization defect
Both come from the collective-interface fidelity theorem. The linear source cancels exactly in (3), because the same complete state initializes all four histories. No parity is assumed for that state. The nonlinear source contribution does not cancel by assertion.
With indexed histories \(h\in\{00,10,01,11\}\) and \((A_{00},A_{10},A_{01},A_{11})=(0,m,m,2m)\), put
The zero-input initialization term is included. Replacing the shared source by independently chosen residuals for the four histories would invalidate the linear cancellation and require a different source allowance.
Combining (18), (22) and (25) bounds the exact full nonlinear statistic:
At the fixed values (5), exact rational arithmetic gives
In particular, for every common actual source in the admitted family and for both mediator classes separately,
This is a finite sign theorem, not merely the asymptotic coefficient (10). No time-coefficient or full-law response evaluation is used in (26)-(28).
Four-reading and independent-record distinctions¶
Four endpoint readings with individual errors bounded by \(\delta\) give
If (4) is constructed from the same three baseline/single-neighbor readings, comparison with the joint reading is exactly (29). It is not an additional independently noisy observation.
A separately recorded additive four-history functional has true mixed statistic zero and recorded mixed statistic in \([-4\delta,4\delta]\). Consequently the sufficient separation from its independent recorded set is \(M_k<-8\delta\), not merely \(M_k<-4\delta\). Equation (28) retains the inherited \(\delta=10^{-30}\) and proves
Thus both the direct four-reading discrepancy and the stronger independent-additive record-set distinction are resolved by the analytic certificate. The latter is separation from the named additive functional, not from every possible effective model.
There is no evaluated numerical response or numerical interval radius in this theorem. A future independent observation producer must retain its own source association, numerical enclosure and frozen resolution policy within a justified part of the positive margin (30). Neither (28) nor the static cone table may be used to narrow that enclosure.
Work, means and identity of all four histories¶
Every branch starts immediately after the same admitted joining event. The existing source proof gives contact work at most \(8\epsilon^2\) and preprobe excess storage at most \(22\epsilon^2\). The donor and receiver are not adjacent, so \(L_{4,22}=0\). For simultaneous impulses,
Use the corresponding subset of impulses in each branch. At their identical pre-event state, \(W_{11}-W_{10}-W_{01}+W_{00}=0\) exactly. The later nonadditivity therefore is not an inserted mixed work term at the event.
For (5), the largest probe work is \(3m^2+12m\epsilon<1.471\,10^{-6}<2\,10^{-6}\). The full postjump excess is below
A sufficient Euclidean quotient-radius square is
The same bounds dominate the single-input and baseline branches. Together with the original joined spectral and cosine premises, they supply the existing radius-\(1/12\) trapping and identity certificate. Continuous loss is not used as an event-work reserve.
The weighted form mean in branch \(ij\) shifts by \(3(ia+jb)/58\), while the weighted phase mean is unchanged. Their four-history mixed common means cancel exactly. All residual coordinates and subsequent means are carried; the histories are not reset to their isolated component origins.
The new property is a conditional, organization-dependent nonlinear response to the simultaneous activity of distinct neighbors. Each single-neighbor functional can be correct while their additive combination fails. The finite certificate does not establish an independently resolved difference between classes, autonomous selection of the two impulses, a laboratory sensor capability or a uniquely fundamental interaction law.
Implementation and verification boundary¶
The private analytic owner
reuses the fixed-law parameter and normalized-Laplacian owners to rebuild
the local onset directly from oriented edges. It does not construct the
collective memory partitions that this static calculation does not consume.
It retains every static phase cone and force row, and combines the complete
cubic, amplitude, source and observation allowances. The private field
direct_cubic_heat_bounds encloses only the heat-transported direct cubic
term \(Z_M\); complete_cubic_correction_upper_bound must still widen that
interval to enclose the complete cubic response. Its finite cone certificate
is restricted to equal positive impulses with \(0<T\le1/8\).
Other admitted signed inputs retain the formal onset and conditional
source/work bounds; absent a separate finite remainder they do not
receive a finite sign verdict.
A zero amplitude or zero horizon gives exact mixed zero for every actual source, without charging an artificial approximation defect. The opposite-input nominal symmetry has its narrower scope stated above; it does not override arbitrary actual-source uncertainty. The shared simultaneous-event ledger uses the unchanged receiver pressure after the donor impulse, because \(L_{4,22}=0\); it does not reuse the delayed same-port pressure bound.
The independent algebra and bound controls check all-edge onset channels, static cones, phase feedback and recoupling allowances, shared-source cancellation, observation-error thresholds and four-branch event accounting. Evaluating these structural and rational certificates is not a selected finite-time coefficient calculation. No new response, source acquisition or archived scientific producer is executed by this admission.